Monday, March 5, 2012

D52 Week 9: Fun and Fancy Free!

Just imagine being part of Walt Disney's film animation division in 1941! Everyone was riding high on the successes of two films and the failure of two others, and it seemed like the sky was the limit! Why, there you had a studio that could continue expanding indefinitely, starting countless new projects before even finishing the previous one, forever and ever, right?

Well, everyone who thought that was kind of a moron. Hitler happened and then the 1940s became the package film decade. Unlike Make Mine Music, with its mostly new (but low-budget, of course) shorts and general making mine music, Fun and Fancy Free was an attempt to blatantly burn off a couple half-completed feature film projects from before the war. The name, of course, comes from the fact that, well, they couldn't be bothered to find any sort of thematic link between the two segments. I've already got one - the climbing of plants is fairly important to both. Walt Disney's Plantastic Adventures?

"Bongo"
Huzzah, more subpar discarded material from an earlier Disney film! In this case, Pinocchio. Jiminy's song isn't bad, honestly, but it presents a weird situation where Mr. Cricket essentially pops up in order to...play a record of someone else narrating our story. Actually, a record of someone else sparsely narrating our story. Anyone who bought that record would've rightly felt pissed, I'd assume.

This story has some pretty nice things going for it, to be sure, but it suffers from its weird length and its incomplete nature. For example, I got a good chuckle out of Bongo's failures at fishing! That's why I was disappointed to see that bit abandoned so quickly. Most of the early material gets thrown out like this without having time to breathe, actually. The animals of the forest (including a comical chipmunk duo who aren't Chip and Dale, or comical) don't really seem to form a cohesive forest community, unlike Bambi, of which those scenes are clearly a low-budget rehash! Bongo's discovery that forests are noisy and terrifying at night completely misses the opportunity to be an effective nightmarish set piece! Clearly, most of the effort was put into the second half, with its uninteresting bear romance. This is uncomfortable both generally because of the pervading "domestic abuse is totally okay!" vibe, and specifically because Lumpjaw is openly a paedophile. Was paedophilia more acceptable in the 40s?

But anyhoozle, yes, it would've been interesting to see how this would've played out as a feature had World War Jr. not caused Disney so much financial distress. For example, would a full-length Bongo have had actual voice acting? I would've hoped so, because Dinah Shore is a woefully inadequate narrator. She's also inadequate at reading imagined bear dialogue. (Apparently a standalone re-released version of "Bongo" featured Jiminy Cricket narrating the entire story, which I'd figure might've worked better, and would've made for an interesting DVD extra.) I also have to wonder if Bongo's original status as a sequel of sorts to Dumbo would've helped or hindered it in the end; the only link that's really left is the animation style, about on par with said film, cheap but extremely competent right when it needs to be.

Plant-Based Element: Bongo is unable to climb trees because he has lived a sheltered and abused life! Ha ha! Eventually, though, his furry little forest friends team up to help him climb, so he can go have treetop sexual congress with Lulubelle. Awwwww.

"Mickey and the Beanstalk"
And now Jiminy Cricket pops up in order to watch someone else introduce this story, in live action. Way to earn that paycheck, Cliff Edwards! Now, I'm not at all familiar with Edgar Bergen's act, to be honest, and this was a pretty damn creepy first impression. I mean, he's having a "party" with a little girl, who is trapped there, alone, with him and his apparently possessed ventriloquist dummies. And he's trying to ply her with candy and cake and cigars and, seriously, am I the only modern viewer who finds this weirdly offputting? Lumpjaw probably liked it, though.

It made sense for "Bongo" to have a narrator, at least, since there wasn't any other voice acting. Here, it's just annoying. Mickey, Donald, and Goofy are established characters and certainly interesting enough to carry the story without Candice Bergen Sr. adding in half-hearted jokes via the most pathetic of all artforms, audio-only ventriloquism. And we definitely didn't need so many complete breaks in the action to cut back to live-action ventriloquism! (Again, a re-release featured a different narrator - the consistently interesting Sterling Holloway.) Like "Bongo", one imagines that the original pre-WWII drafts of this didn't involve narration, and it probably flowed better without it. It's interesting how things like these celebrity narrators were pretty much necessary to sell these package films during the 40s, but have since become the thing contributing most to them being a hard sell for modern audiences.

Bergen explains that Willie the Giant stole the singing harp because he's "selfish", but it seems obvious to everyone that a more like explanation is that, well....he's clearly just a simple-minded fool. Mickey, Donald, Goofy - dudes, you broke into the poor guy's house. He has a right to be upset. You could've at least explained why you need the harp back so badly. Willie's a loveable idiot, give him the benefit of the doubt. It's a little disconcerting how quickly our heroes resort to murder. Yeah, that's a problem that's pretty much inherent to every adaptation of Jack and the Beanstalk, but still...here, the story is told with characters who are supposed to be likeable! Despite their weird callousness, though, they're by far the best thing about this. Most of the story is sloppily written - it features a location blatantly named Happy Valley, after all - but Donald Duck is consistently amusing, Goofy is consistently amusing, and Mickey Mouse is, um....famous?

Plant-Based Element: Spoiler alert! There's a beanstalk! A beanstalk that Mickey Mouse uses to senselessly murder some dude!

Overall
Saludos Amigos, The Three Caballeros, and Make Mine Music aren't Disney classics by any means, but one positive thing they had going for them was variety. If you didn't like one short, there were five more waiting for you right around the corner. You're bound to like at least one of those, right? Clearly, Fun and Fancy Free is lacking in this regard. If you don't like one segment, you'd better hope and pray that you like the other, or else you just wasted 73 minutes of your life for no good reason! Fortunately, both "Bongo" and "Mickey and the Beanstalk" feature a healthy helping of charm; unfortunately, the segments play out with the minimal depth of eight-minute short subjects even though they last about four times as long. Combine that with the weirdly high paedophilic creep factor (seriously, is this just me???) and it's suddenly a bit hard to recommend. It's charming, but not charming enough...


UNNECESSARY DIRECT-TO-DVD DISNEY SEQUEL CONCEPT THINGAMADOODLE: Considerably More Fun, with a Negative Quantity of Fancy returns to the world of these Two Fabulous Characters in two all-new not-quite-shorts-but-definitely-not-features-either! In "Beach Blanket Bongo", Bongo and Lulubelle get married, with Lumpjaw as his best man for some reason. They go on a fabulous Hawaiian honeymoon, but Lulubelle gets lost at sea, and it's up to Bongo's totally radical surfing skillz to save the day! Kyle Massey narrates. Then, in "Mickey and Another Beanstalk", it's another exact retelling of Jack and the Beanstalk starring Mickey Mouse, because apparently that was Walt Disney's most favourite thing in the world to do over and over. Candice Bergen Jr. narrates.

7 comments:

  1. You know what's funny? I didn't know the names of the movies or the characters, but I totally remember what they look like. I've seen the bears in some Disney bilingual education books. And the giant was always in the audience of the House of Mouse clapping all the time. You'd think the people sitting around him would go deaf or something from the sound of those huge hands.

    You sure Lumpjaw doesn't just have an overactive pituitary gland like most bad guys in teenage romances like this do? I assume he's the huge black bear. Also, domestic abuse was totally OK back then. Ask Ralph Kramden!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is Lumpjaw supposed to be a black bear? I don't think the movie specified, but that's probably about right. You can tell he's Lumpjaw, because his jaw's just one big lump. He's the Jay Leno of the Disneyverse!

      This is the second of the 1940s package films to be a little more uncomfortable to watch in 2012, now that "making love" refers to just flat-out doing the nasty and all.

      Delete
  2. Yeah, is it directly mentioned that Lumpjaw is differently aged from Lulubelle? If so, Disney was way ahead of 4chan!

    And seems especially uneven that Mickey and friends have no qualms about Willie's death considering they had just made a big deal over not killing a certain variety of livestock that is routinely killed for consumption. Oh, but the cow was innocent and Willie stole and captured a few people. Grounds for capital punishment???

    I like how Lumpjaw's tree is snapping. It's a surprisingly touching image too, for a jocular one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was under the impression, at the time, that they made a big deal out of not killing the cow because it was clearly a dairy cow. But now I'm thinking, if that was the case, why didn't they each at least have a lovely glass of milk to wash down their breadfilm and beanslice sammiches?

      Is there any reason they had to stay in Happy Valley in the first place? If they were starving badly enough for Donald to start devouring plates and cutlery, surely they could've just made a trek to some place whose wellbeing wasn't based solely on the existence of an unnerving living musical instrument, no?

      After seeing Make Mine Music the week before, I have to suspect that perhaps Walt Disney had some sort of major feud with some guy named Willie, and thought it would be cool to start senselessly killing Willies off in his studio's films, as a form of cathartic release. I mean, what other possible explanation could there be? Coincidence? Pshaw!

      Yes, it is by far the sweetest gay joke I've ever told! Granted, it now bothers me that the trees are clearly different heights but oh well. Apparently I approve of GIMP's built-in softglow filter! And, as everyone knows, airbrush = tenderness.

      Delete
    2. Gah! I can't even edit my own darned comments on my own darned Bloggerblog?

      Just wanted to add: Wasn't Willie more of a hero when he resurfaced in "Mickey's Christmas Carol", as one of the Ghosts of Christmas Verb Tenses? Dude's totally taking being murdered in cold blood in stride! We could all learn a lesson in forgiveness from Willie the Non-Whale Giant.

      Delete
    3. Also assuming that the cow was still not dried up, and that they were more worried about food than drink why not just sell its milk for money to buy food instead of selling the whole cow itself? And if it isn't capable of giving milk, then the only reason anyone else would buy it from them (unless Mickey lies about its milkability) would be for its meat, meaning it would end up getting slaughtered anyway! But, there I go, questioning the logic of this orally-passed story about a magic skyscraping beanstalk.

      You seem to have gotten the hang of the many effects GIMP has to offer much more quickly than I have (or will?)!

      MY WHACKJOB THEORY: Walt Disney plagiarized the name of his cartoon "Steamboat Willie" off of an actual steamboat. The owner of the steamboat - who named it after himself - demands royalties for the success of the film. Disney flat-out refuses. Arguments ensue, leading into a vicious vendetta against the real Steamboat Willie. Who happens to be Jewish.

      Heyyy, maybe Ghost Willie the Giant didn't realize that Mickey & co. chopped down the stalk. Maybe from his point of view the whole thing just snapped by its self under the pressure. But that is an interesting way to look at it: That the Ghost of Christmas Present was played by the actual ghost of Willie. So, when he lifts the roof off of Edgar Bergen's house, is he a ghost then too? What about the other Christmas ghosts? Were Goofy, Jiminy Cricket and Pete also actually dead? Or were any or all of them just dressed and made-up as spirits?

      Delete
    4. You mean to say that you've never fiddled around with the Filters>Artistic menu? Granted, cartoony things with lineart wouldn't benefit from any of it, but things like the stars and moon in the fourth panel, my inferior attempt to mimic an actual painterly background from the film, definitely enjoy a little Softglow for luminosity!

      Would that explain why both of these dead Willies were big, just like steamboats are big? And one of them was a water-dweller, just like steamboats are found in water? And the other one made our heroes nearly starve to death by taking away their Happy Harp, just like the real Steamboat Willie would've made Walt Disney nearly starve to death, in that he would've been ever so slightly less rich?

      Clearly, they were all dead, but as a reward for carrying out their Christmas ghostery out so very well, they were brought back to life by some sort of magical entity associated with Christmas. Let's call this hypothetical being "Christ", for lack of something more imaginative.

      Delete